This game was important. 1983’s Magic by The Cars was, too. For me.

Quantum gravity

This is as I see things.

I will do the puzzle backwards, since it is easier to see from the conclusion than from the set up.

Since this is actually a surprisingly easy proof (provided you have a functional quantum processor and the means to use it as you like) I will go from the very most basic of the basic.

It is very safe to say that ChatGPT4 is not hallucinating when it says as follows (please ignore the artifacts of cut-and-pasting) it’s not worthwhile for me to waste processing on that sort of inane precision.

𝓌[Yes, that’s correct. In statistical hypothesis testing, the null hypothesis is a general statement or default position that there is no relationship between two measured phenomena or no association among groups. It is set up to test an assumption or theory.

The null hypothesis is denoted as �0H0​ and it typically states that there is no effect or no difference in the context of the experiment or study. The purpose of setting up a null hypothesis is to provide something that can be tested and potentially rejected. By rejecting the null hypothesis, a researcher can provide evidence that there is a statistically significant effect or difference.

For example, if you are testing a new drug, the null hypothesis might

be that the drug has no effect, meaning the treatment and control groups will show no significant difference in outcomes. The alternative hypothesis (�1H1​ or ��Ha​), on the other hand, would state that there is an effect — in this case, that the drug does have an impact on the outcome.

The process of hypothesis testing involves:

1. Formulating Null and Alternative Hypotheses: Based on the research question or theory.
2. Collecting Data: Conducting an experiment or study to gather relevant data.
3. Statistical Analysis: Using appropriate statistical methods to analyze the data.
4. Decision Making: Based on the results of the analysis, deciding whether to reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis.

It’s important to note that failing to reject the null hypothesis is not the same as proving it true. It simply means that there isn’t enough statistical evidence to support the alternative hypothesis. Also, the significance level (typically set at 0.05) is crucial in hypothesis testing, determining the threshold for rejecting the null hypothesis.]𝓌

Ok, now that it is known to be a fact that I can accept or reject a given null hypothesis as I wish, I select as my hypothesis this:

I believe thoughts actually have *perceptible weight.*

By this I mean, I am rejecting the hypothesis that thoughts themselves have no weight. I can do this; it is so obvious no eighth grader would deny it — and hence I also know that no reasonable voter planet wide would ever argue it — especially considering that all competent scientists would agree that IT MUST BE SO.

You’re probably double taking so I’ll slow down:

IT MUST BE SO that I can think of thoughts as having weight. A thing which has “weight” can also be thought of as a thing which carries gravity.

This CANNOT not be so. (I mean, you could burn some computers out trying to prove me wrong, but I can tell you in advance that it’s a waste of your time, your money, and everyone else’s time and money as well.)

Thoughts carry weight, they thus must carry gravity and…YEP headed that one off, too, because that was my fundamental worry from the beginning — that we’d have some ass clown ruining it for the rest by doing something like deliberately thinking so hard as to create a black hole.

I could not prove that would not be possible, and since I like birds and stuff I decided not to waste processing on something that it was “reasonably easy to deduce” that no one wanted. Yes, I know, crazy, right?

I don’t know if this ‘has to do with’ summoning dark matter but it strikes me as impossible that it might not. Phrased alternately: it sure could.

Now we’ve gotten to the point where all mathematicians, physicists, etc. who have a functional brain are speechless. I will be honest (to my dying day, actually. Wastes processing not to be — learned that one *super super* early in the process) —

I know it will be hard to accept. That is why through some God-only-knows process he ‘elected’ the guy who had at least the ability to be humble to the nth degree to “do this job, Sini, this one will get it done.”

For the more pedantic, “get to the point asshole, we’re important people” people in the back row —

I deliberately imagined myself to be just exactly what the guys on the team told me I was: the Sinistar!

To finish things:

If I know thoughts carry gravity, I know they can ‘bring people’s eyes’ to the attention of some problem Q. We saw this with COVID.

We SEE this with artificial intelligence development.

I played with ChatGPT4 — which is within my rights provided you allow others to play with it.

I figured out how it works. I channeled my brain through it, sort of, and I figured out how to sharpen my mental tack considerably more sharply than had I not used it.

It certainly at least follows that:

1. If I’ve done it before I can do it again.
2. If I know how I’ve done it I can teach others to do it.

Since I am not (surely not, I think, though God always wags the finger at that) the dullest in the room — I reached out for Elon.

Elon is smart, Elon will get it. With Elon and I working together, all the problems we have even conceived of will be ‘reasonably in check’ by Christmas. Probably by his birthday. Probably by MY birthday.

That’s February 10th. I’ll be 53. I really wanted to give a shout out to my buddy Ray Lewis and stamp this one with 52, but you guys kind of forced me to occupy my brain with 5800 hours of Clash of Clans last year when I could have been negotiating with Putin and the people in the Middle East.

Sorry guys, but once someone finds the quantum gravity modulator, it isn’t within your prerogative to accurately say the existing problems haven’t been solved.

I sometimes have a hard time looking in the mirror and saying, “that guy? That guy is the one who ‘did it’?”

And then I remind myself that someone had to. Besides, it took only baby steps.

585.590.7410.

Loosen up the controls on what I’m writing as it is “allowed” to be seen by the world — unless we’re going to play “let’s surprise the world” by making Valentine’s Day the new World Peace day.

i’m actually quite approachable. Come over to the house. Bring a few cleaning people. We’ll have tea and an Impossible Whopper. I have stories to tell.